A television station broadcasts US Federal Reserve Chair Chair Jerome Powell speaking in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York on August 23, 2024. Powell said on August 23 that the "time has come" for the US to start cutting interest rates, adding that his "confidence has grown" that the battle against inflation is on track. "The time has come for policy to adjust," he said in a keynote speech at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium in Wyoming, according to prepared remarks. ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images
Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, has put out a study that revealed how aggressive interest rate hikes were a crucial part of its battle against inflation over the past two years. According to Reuters, the study showed that the Fed gained its credibility and public trust through rate hikes as it proved to control US inflation the most.
This new study stands in contrast to what economists Michael Bauer of the San Francisco Fed, Carolin Pflueger at the University of Chicago, and Adi Sunderam at the Harvard Business School found to be the case.
Initially, their study found that financial markets were not convinced what the central bank would do. Despite speeches and assurances by Fed Chairman Jerome Jerome Powell and other officials, the view that the US central bank would push back harder on inflation really only got going after it began raising its policy interest rate in March.
"Substantial rate hikes were apparently necessary for perceptions to shift," the researchers noted. "The public did not fully understand the Fed's strategy and policy rule prior to liftoff." This shift in perception, particularly after the Fed accelerated its rate increases in mid-2022, made monetary policy more effective.
This, per IMF, allowed the central bank to influence financial conditions faster and control inflation with less damage to the economy than might have occurred otherwise.
The findings serve as a cautionary tale for future central bankers who may rely too heavily on "talk therapy" - the power of influencing economic outcomes through verbal communication alone.
The researchers emphasized that while public trust in the Fed's commitment to controlling inflation was ultimately earned, it required decisive action to back up the words.
As the researchers concluded, "Policy rate actions contribute to, and may even be necessary for, the effectiveness of communication, particularly when uncertainty about the monetary policy framework is high." The study also suggested that future policymakers could benefit from making the Fed's response to inflation more explicit in its communications, ensuring that actions consistently align with public expectations.
Join the Conversation